Marginalisation and the label

Now ‘Marginalisation of Muslims’ in NCERT textbook, screamed the headline (Indian Express web edition, May 28, 2008). The news item was about how the topic ‘Marginalisation of Muslims’ was included in NCERT textbook. If one failed to consider the single quotes, the sentence could be easily misconstrued. Anyway, the article spoke about how the NCERT had introduced a chapter ‘Muslims and Marginalisation’ in the Class-VIII Social Sciences textbook to make students aware about how the Muslims had not got proper benefits of the social and economic development in the country. The chapter also cited the findings of the study on Muslims’ status prepared by Justice Rajinder Sachar in 2006.

While 90% of the readers comments to the article, abused Muslims and asked them to show their loyalty, a few voices discussing the issue of ‘proportional representation’ and other forms of marginalisation was also seen. While I am not reproducing those comments here, I am sharing what I wrote, and some of my response to the comments.

First comment

Marginalisation in any form needs to be condemned. If marginalisation of Muslims is given to highlight the social inequalities with respect to religion, then it should be appreciated. More so in this vitiated atmosphere, where a whole community is often treated with suspicion and contempt. I feel that the marginalisation of Muslims is not just in the arena of economic development, but it spreads to even routine matters such as sharing a neighbourhood, giving a house on rent, and so on. Some of the comments in this space also reflects the deep hatred that people harbour towards an entire community.

One comment was by a person (Sushil Bhardwaj) who said that honest development for every marginalized groups without the label of what group would be the real solution, and not proportional representation. He further added that creating jobs, lifelong learning opportunity, building self esteem, etc. was needed and not divisive projects.
My reponse to him was as follows:

Sub: Marginalisation intrinsically linked to the label

You make a very important point about “proportional representation”. Yes, if one starts going about proportional representation, then there is no end to it. Your points about providing an initial impetus (education) and then letting people take off on their own steam is also well taken. But this would work ideally only in an situation where merit equals opportunity. The assumption in your statement is that if good education is provided, then all are at a level playing field, which enables them to go on and create opportunities for themselves. But this rarely happens, because the impact of marginalisation is not just lack of opportunities; it permeates through the very social fabric of life. Let me give you one example. It is very difficult for a well-educated middle class muslim family to get accommodation in common housing societies in urban cities of India.

The Sachar report highlights many other such glaring facts. So, it is not just the lack of opportunities which is creating these tensions it goes much beyond, especially for castes and religions in India which have been traditionally or systematically marginalised. This is not to say that marginsalisation does not exist abroad. The situation of blacks in the US, or Indians in many other countries is also similar. So, basically marginalisation is often linked to the label of caste or religion or ethnicity, and delinking them would be over-looking that reality. But I totally agree with you that overall ‘honest development (as you call it) for every marginalized groups, creating jobs, lifelong learning opportunity, building self esteem, etc’ would bring down marginalisation to a great extent, and may even do away with the need for label based solutions. But until then…. Probably dialogues like these would help in coming up with newer and more creative solutions.