A Christmas Wish

I normally write a short reflection during Christmas. My reflection this year is on Christmas in the aftermath of the Orissa violence…

A Christmas Wish

- dedicated to all the people of Kandhamal, Orissa, especially to the 8000+ people still living in relief camps, and to all those who live under the shadow of violence, anywhere in the world.

It was almost 12 at night
I tiptoed to where my children lay
Christmas was here, here at last, it was just a few moments away.
The Christmas star was burning bright
and it showed me the way, as I slowly tiptoed, very slowly tiptoed
to where my children lay.

Last year we had a blast,
Christmas had been a merry day
This year we are on a fast, on this beautiful Christmas day

By then I had reached the spot
the spot where they lay,
my children’s grave was bathed in light, in the silvery whey.
The Christmas star looked so bright
as it did that early Christmas morn,
much like the time in Bethlehem, when the little baby Jesus was born.

As in those days, Herod had said,
no baby boy should be alive, kill them all, show no mercy,
all I want is their head.

So it happened 2000 years later, in our very land,
in the land we call our home, they came,
and desecrated it with a sleight of hand
They burnt our places of worship
and set our fields on fire.
Next they came to our home with lathis and burning tyres.

As they looked at my sleeping children, I pleaded
and fell at their bloodied feet. Spare them, my brothers, and take my life, I cried.
but it fell on stone deaf ears.

2008 has been an eventful year for us.
driven out of home, plundered and murdered, were we
but Christmas this year has become, has become very real!
The baby who was born
on that cold Christmas night, grew up to show
that God’s love is for all, yea for all, irrespective of who we were.

Give it, spread it, never withhold it, He said,
more for those who hate you, than for a friend.
As a witness of this love, you I send.

As I knelt down at my children’s graves
I shed a silent tear. Yes, for my little children,
but also for those who shed their innocent blood.
With hearts cold with hatred, and eyes filled with fury,
no rest, no peace they knew
for as they killed my children, they killed a piece of themselves too.

With these thoughts raging in my head,
I wondered, if peace I would ever know,
Must be the same, I thought, for those, who had struck the fatal blow.

As I closed my eye in prayer, His Spirit did I feel
urging me to love them,
for they too needed to heal.
Filled with His Spirit, I shouted into the night,
Lord I have a Christmas wish. Help me to love as you did,
so much, that for us you even died!

- Naveen I. Thomas
Dec 24, 2008

Who is a terrorist?

During recent discussions with a friend, I found him implying the oft-repeated notion that all those who were caught in recent times for “terrorist” activities were Muslims. I had dealt with a similar issue in an earlier posting (Stop communalising terror!)

While the police promptly come up with some Muslim group’s name for involvement in the terrorist activities, it remains a mystery as to how many of these actually end in convictions? Tehelka in an investigative piece on SIMI, which is accused in every other case, “reveals a shocking web of dubious cases being pursued against so-called operatives of SIMI — cases which lack evidence, cases which flagrantly ignore standard procedures of criminal investigation and trial, cases that callously destroy the lives of young men and their families.” (Tehelka Magazine, Vol 5, Issue 32, Dated Aug 16, 2008)

It is interesting that those who say that “Muslims are behind every terrorist attack” conveniently ignore some incidences of violence. Today thousands of Christian families in Orissa are hiding in their jungles fearing for their lives. Their houses, churches and property have been destroyed and many of them killed. Does this not count as a case of terrorism? Oh sorry, the perpetrators of this violence were not Muslims, so this can’t be terrorism! In Gujarat, when the genocide took place and Muslims were killed in droves, we didn’t call it “terrorism”. We called it a “spontaneous outpouring of emotions”! In Orissa too, the violence followed the murder of a Swamiji. So, the violence was justified as “an emotional outburst of the Swamiji’s supporters”, and not an act of terrorism. The Government claimed that the Swamiji was killed by the Naxalities. So, again it was not terrorism as no Muslims were involved. The right wing extremist groups said, ‘yes, they were Naxalites, but they were Christian Naxalites, so the violence is only a retribution for the Swamiji’s killing’.

I am reminded of an incident which happened last year. One Sunday morning, a temple priest was found hanging from a tree near his temple. Violence followed for two days. Vehicles were stoned and normal life was disrupted. The supporters of the temple priest said that he had been murdered and it could not be a case of suicide. The Government moved in fast to bring the situation under control. They established talks with the violent groups and got them to hold their peace atleast until the post-mortem report was out. There was wide-spread fear of communal clashes if it turned out that the death was due to murder. Eventually it turned out that it had been a case of suicide and there ended the matter. Now, this situation too could have gone out of hand. Accusations could have been hurled at anybody or any community. Those who had an axe to grind could have easily vitiated the atmosphere. The minority communities in that area actually lived in great fear for 2-3 days, because they knew that they would be the first target. But the swift decisive action taken by the Government saved the day.

We seem to have perfected the art of calling violence by different names based on who is accused (please note, not proven guilty, but accused). We call it terrorism, we call it naxalism, we call it retribution. In essence it is the same thing – one human being killing another.